# Standard conformance tables

**URL:** <https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/standard-conformance-tables/4384>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [September 22, 2022, 11:10am UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/standard-conformance-tables/4384 "2022-09-22T11:10:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jme52](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c4cdca/32.png) [@jme52](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/u/jme52)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2022, 9:18am UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/standard-conformance-tables/4384/9 "2022-09-28T09:18:49Z")

</div>

Thank you for the updated tables.

I am also a bit confused about the PGI/NVIDIA compiler (2008 table contains PGI 18.1, 2018 table has Nvidia 16.4 instead), could you clarify that? I would expect here a recent version (22.x) of nvfortran.

Regarding the outdated data, maybe it would be easier to collect information if the browsable database discussed in [Compiler support tables](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/compiler-support-tables/3059) was implemented? In the end, we want to increase vendor engagement in the adoption of new language features, maybe this could become a PR thing where we use vendor inputs to rank compilers?

---

_[View the full topic](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/standard-conformance-tables/4384)._