# New paper on amdflang **URL:** \ **Category:** Uncategorized\ **Created:** [October 23, 2026, 10:40pm UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/new-paper-on-amdflang/11194 "2026-10-23T22:40:38Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 3\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![sumseq](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/fortran-lang.discourse.group/sumseq/32/3083_2.png) [@sumseq](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/u/sumseq)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 10:40pm UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/new-paper-on-amdflang/11194/1 "2026-10-23T22:40:38Z")
Just came across this: [https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3837730.3837734](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3837730.3837734) ---
**Author:** ![certik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/fortran-lang.discourse.group/certik/32/4_2.png) [@certik](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/u/certik)\ **Post date:** [October 24, 2026, 3:54am UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/new-paper-on-amdflang/11194/2 "2026-10-24T03:54:58Z")
The paper’s title is " Are We There Yet? Evaluating AMDFlang Fortran Compiler Readiness on Production Workloads", so was curious if the paper conforms to the [Betteridge’s Law of Headlines](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines) and the answer seems to be that it does. ---
**Author:** ![RJaBi](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/fortran-lang.discourse.group/rjabi/32/5161_2.png) [@RJaBi](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/u/RJaBi)\ **Post date:** [October 24, 2026, 7:14am UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/new-paper-on-amdflang/11194/3 "2026-10-24T07:14:06Z")
It sounds like they did significantly better than when I last tested it (March '25). I had a great time at a workshop/hackathon reporting bugs in openMP offload for code such as taking the transpose of a 3x3 matrix or doing a +1 reduction. It was still nice to see the progress in the compiler though! I’m glad to see it’s taken further steps!