I’m all for stdlib becoming a complete scientific toolbox, given that Fortran is so heavily used in science. I’m currently stretched a little thin, but I’ve been meaning to (and still plan to) dive a little deeper into stdlib, to understand how it works, and to see if/how I could contribute. Would love nothing more than to have a single lib as a toolbox for all regular analyses (i.e. everything I don’t need specialised models for). It would also make it less complicated to re-introduce it to university classrooms for a number of reasons.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Releasing a modernized `QuadProg` for strictly convex quadratic programming | 0 | 174 | April 14, 2025 | |
| Modern Fortran interface for NLopt | 18 | 2178 | July 24, 2022 | |
| Fortran stdlib: sufficient for scientific programming? | 37 | 1310 | December 26, 2024 | |
|
About f2py, IPC and Wrappers
|
13 | 1862 | September 15, 2021 | |
| Can not operate Mordern minpack from github fortran-lang/minpack | 3 | 490 | March 26, 2023 |