Is it really?
At the beginning there is a character(:), allocatable object, and after the C round-trip we get a character, pointer object. I wonder if it’s valid or if the deallocation works by chance (my opinion is that it works by chance)…
Is it really?
At the beginning there is a character(:), allocatable object, and after the C round-trip we get a character, pointer object. I wonder if it’s valid or if the deallocation works by chance (my opinion is that it works by chance)…