# LFortran now supports all intrinsic functions

**URL:** <https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/lfortran-now-supports-all-intrinsic-functions/8844>\
**Category:** Announcements\
**Created:** [November 14, 2024, 4:03pm UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/lfortran-now-supports-all-intrinsic-functions/8844 "2024-11-14T16:03:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ivanpribec](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/fortran-lang.discourse.group/ivanpribec/32/3290_2.png) [@ivanpribec](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/u/ivanpribec)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2024, 10:48pm UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/lfortran-now-supports-all-intrinsic-functions/8844/15 "2024-11-19T22:48:12Z")

</div>

> [@Size of long array](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/size-of-long-array/3676/47):
>
> exactly so slight_smile My example actually shows two problems with summing a huge number of small values (random numbers are between 0 and 1). The first, obvious is roundoff error and the second is the finite density of real values in the computer representation. In 4-bytes reals, above the magic value of 16777216, is it impossible to add a number less than one and get the result any different. Using higher precision accumulator helps with that. But, I must say, @ivanpribec’s trick with sum…

---

_[View the full topic](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/lfortran-now-supports-all-intrinsic-functions/8844)._