# LFortran compiles LAPACK **URL:** \ **Category:** LFortran\ **Created:** [February 5, 2026, 4:58pm UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/lfortran-compiles-lapack/10695 "2026-02-05T16:58:45Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![certik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/fortran-lang.discourse.group/certik/32/4_2.png) [@certik](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/u/certik)\ **Post date:** [February 5, 2026, 4:58pm UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/lfortran-compiles-lapack/10695/1 "2026-02-05T16:58:45Z")
LFortran can now compile LAPACK, single/double precision, real/complex, 32-bit/64-bit integers, all tests pass: - [LFortran compiles LAPACK -](https://lfortran.org/blog/2026/02/lfortran-compiles-lapack/) Thank you @ert for getting it over the finish line! ---
**Author:** ![fxm](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/fortran-lang.discourse.group/fxm/32/5726_2.png) [@fxm](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/u/fxm)\ **Post date:** [February 5, 2026, 5:04pm UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/lfortran-compiles-lapack/10695/2 "2026-02-05T17:04:08Z")
That’s a significant milestone/achievement and great news! Thanks @certik, @ert, and all other contributors. ---
**Author:** ![Beliavsky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ba8739/32.png) [@Beliavsky](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/u/Beliavsky)\ **Post date:** [February 5, 2026, 5:38pm UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/lfortran-compiles-lapack/10695/3 "2026-02-05T17:38:01Z")
Very good. What about the modernization, **[fortran-lapack](https://github.com/perazz/fortran-lapack)?** ---
**Author:** ![certik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/fortran-lang.discourse.group/certik/32/4_2.png) [@certik](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/u/certik)\ **Post date:** [February 5, 2026, 7:53pm UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/lfortran-compiles-lapack/10695/4 "2026-02-05T19:53:50Z")
We should tackle the `fortran-lapack` soon — we currently don’t support quadruple precision, but probably a good time to implement it anyway. @FedericoPerini should we move it under fortran-lang? ---
**Author:** ![FedericoPerini](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/fortran-lang.discourse.group/federicoperini/32/1750_2.png) [@FedericoPerini](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/u/FedericoPerini)\ **Post date:** [February 5, 2026, 9:18pm UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/lfortran-compiles-lapack/10695/5 "2026-02-05T21:18:03Z")
the modernized LAPACK work has been integrated into the Fortran Standard Library since v0.4.0 which was released a bit over two years ago but since then, development has continued directly within stdlib, with a growing set of higher-level APIs. Congratulations on the big milestone! It’s nice to see interest from the compiler side as well. ---
**Author:** ![certik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/fortran-lang.discourse.group/certik/32/4_2.png) [@certik](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/u/certik)\ **Post date:** [February 5, 2026, 10:05pm UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/lfortran-compiles-lapack/10695/6 "2026-02-05T22:05:53Z")
Perfect, then we’ll just get the latest stdlib working again, we got some older version working, but not the very latest version. ---
**Author:** ![tyranids](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/3e96dc/32.png) [@tyranids](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/u/tyranids)\ **Post date:** [February 6, 2026, 2:24am UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/lfortran-compiles-lapack/10695/7 "2026-02-06T02:24:27Z")
That is AWESOME ---
**Author:** ![zaikunzhang](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/fortran-lang.discourse.group/zaikunzhang/32/785_2.png) [@zaikunzhang](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/u/zaikunzhang)\ **Post date:** [February 6, 2026, 6:35am UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/lfortran-compiles-lapack/10695/8 "2026-02-06T06:35:21Z")
Magnificent! Monumental! Congratulations to the LFortran team!