# Improving Fortran Results in the Julia Micro-benchmarks

**URL:** <https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/improving-fortran-results-in-the-julia-micro-benchmarks/198>\
**Category:** Help\
**Created:** [July 8, 2020, 2:39pm UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/improving-fortran-results-in-the-julia-micro-benchmarks/198 "2020-07-08T14:39:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 23

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lkedward](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/fortran-lang.discourse.group/lkedward/32/72_2.png) [@lkedward](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/u/lkedward)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2022, 8:08pm UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/improving-fortran-results-in-the-julia-micro-benchmarks/198/23 "2022-04-12T20:08:12Z")

</div>

My improvements to this Fortran benchmark have now been merged into the Julia benchmarks repository and the benchmarks page has been updated.

> <https://github.com/JuliaLang/Microbenchmarks/pull/54>
>
> Replaces an inefficient internal write statement that was skewing the parse\_int …benchmark results.
> 
> Squash of #41 to run on benchmark ci
> 
> Closes #41

Edit: as pointed out by Milan, it looks like the online results page has not actually been updated yet.

---

_[View the full topic](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/improving-fortran-results-in-the-julia-micro-benchmarks/198)._