# How to solve the same numerical Problem in 7 different Programming Languages

**URL:** <https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/how-to-solve-the-same-numerical-problem-in-7-different-programming-languages/3548>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [May 25, 2022, 4:13am UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/how-to-solve-the-same-numerical-problem-in-7-different-programming-languages/3548 "2022-05-25T04:13:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 137

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FortranFan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/96bed5/32.png) [@FortranFan](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/u/FortranFan)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2022, 5:13am UTC](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/how-to-solve-the-same-numerical-problem-in-7-different-programming-languages/3548/137 "2022-06-01T05:13:23Z")

</div>

> [@CRquantum](#):
>
> … I mean you may start a thread and ask people to upvote for this solution. …

Please see this:

> [@Eliminate implicit mapping](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/eliminate-implicit-mapping/1612):
>
> Please see this: Issue #90 proposes to eliminate implicit typing in Fortran. There is strong resistance to this, there being a major concern that to “eliminate implicit typing”, if pursued with any seriousness, will require a deletion of the IMPLICIT statement from the language. There is great worry some existing code would break as a result. Can the Fortran community then coalesce to a somewhat simpler proposal, to eliminate implicit mapping instead? The main aspect of such a proposal is …

---

_[View the full topic](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/how-to-solve-the-same-numerical-problem-in-7-different-programming-languages/3548)._
