I use stdc++ containers inside fortran, e.g. vector, map, list etc. Every fortran code I wrote could get near/to the performance of those containers, but was usually never faster. It would be a game changer for fortran if the fortran std lib development could replicate/improve/outperform stdc++. This is because it is exactly the absence of the house keeping stuff stdc++ provides which makes life for fortrunners sooo tedious. This obviously feeds into the counter-intuitive rise of phyton
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
bind(C) philosophy: pointer-by-value or type-by-reference? | 12 | 1038 | July 3, 2022 | |
Return an array of strings from fortran to c++ | 14 | 1803 | February 3, 2023 | |
Calling C++ from Fortran
|
23 | 7865 | May 18, 2022 | |
C++ equivalents of Fortran concepts
|
23 | 3122 | December 29, 2023 | |
Possible to do C++ interoperation with std::function? | 3 | 997 | January 18, 2023 |