I use stdc++ containers inside fortran, e.g. vector, map, list etc. Every fortran code I wrote could get near/to the performance of those containers, but was usually never faster. It would be a game changer for fortran if the fortran std lib development could replicate/improve/outperform stdc++. This is because it is exactly the absence of the house keeping stuff stdc++ provides which makes life for fortrunners sooo tedious. This obviously feeds into the counter-intuitive rise of phyton
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
bind(C) philosophy: pointer-by-value or type-by-reference? | 12 | 1048 | July 3, 2022 | |
Issues interfacing between C++ and Fortran
|
15 | 3253 | April 12, 2021 | |
Calling C++ from Fortran
|
23 | 7945 | May 18, 2022 | |
Questions from a Fortran HPC Webinar | 30 | 2706 | July 15, 2021 | |
Return an array of strings from fortran to c++ | 14 | 1807 | February 3, 2023 |