I use stdc++ containers inside fortran, e.g. vector, map, list etc. Every fortran code I wrote could get near/to the performance of those containers, but was usually never faster. It would be a game changer for fortran if the fortran std lib development could replicate/improve/outperform stdc++. This is because it is exactly the absence of the house keeping stuff stdc++ provides which makes life for fortrunners sooo tedious. This obviously feeds into the counter-intuitive rise of phyton
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fortran for C++ programmers ... guidelines?
|
7 | 1400 | July 28, 2020 | |
FPM with multiple main programs C,C++,Fortran | 3 | 544 | December 30, 2022 | |
First Time Contribution help needed | 34 | 1640 | March 28, 2023 | |
GSOC 2023 | Guidance regarding project proposal for "Support for C++ (fpm)" | 8 | 719 | April 4, 2023 | |
FPM discussion at Hacker News
|
6 | 794 | April 30, 2021 |