Great questions and comments.
No the paper I linked upthread addresses about a third of the 202Y items.
One other review for an additional third of the items is this:
The rest are pending in terms of a documented take on them.
@sblionel, who is also the WG5 convenor, grouped together the items for the subteams to review based on a variety of feedback including those provided by the Community here as collected by @certik in this thread. The currently tabled list is https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/22/22-176r5.pdf
I simply can’t thank @certik enough for the tremendous Community engagement here and elsewhere. And to @sblionel to facilitate and open up and maintain and drive the various communication and feedback channels with the WG5/J3 working groups. There are all invaluable contributions to Fortran.
As to Fortran 202Y, noticeably Generics is the highly “desired” feature list. Everything else require considerable convincing and very strong “use cases” to move up the “desirable” index!